An Overview of Procurement Practice in the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), Malaysia

Authors

  • Mohd Rafizu Muda Perdana Centre of STI Policy Studies, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Norizan Sulong Perdana Centre of STI Policy Studies, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Aini Suzana Ariffin Perdana Centre of STI Policy Studies, Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Aref Charehzehi Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai, 81310 Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jostip.v9n1.134

Keywords:

Defence; Procurement; Value for Money; Policy; Malaysian MINDEF

Abstract

This paper aims to describe the general overview of procurement practices at the Ministry of Defence, Malaysia. Although the Ministry’s procurement practices must align with the general public procurement guidelines, rules and regulations set up by the Ministry of Finance, defence procurement deals with highly diversified asset acquisitions which can be extremely complex and sensitive in nature, process, and regulations. As such, it is crucial to examine the current defence procurement practices in Malaysia from the perspective of two policy documents namely the National Defence Policy and the Defence White Paper. Brief discussions on the types of procurement and agencies involved in the procurement process are also presented. Previous studies related to defence procurement both from Western literature and local studies are also offered along with a brief view on the notion of value for money.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-25

How to Cite

Muda, M. R., Sulong, N., Ariffin, A. S., & Charehzehi, A. (2023). An Overview of Procurement Practice in the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF), Malaysia. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, 9(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.11113/jostip.v9n1.134

Issue

Section

Articles